您所在的位置: 首页» 新闻中心» 公告通知» 学术讲座

“数字与法治”系列论坛(III)—— Lee Andrew Bygrave:自动化决策的法律规制

题目:The Legal Regulation of Automated Decision Making (自动化决策的法律规制)
 
时间:2022年9月22日(周四)20:00-22:00
 
腾讯会议 ID:527 459 048
 
开讲学者:Lee Andrew Bygrave (挪威奥斯陆大学私法系法学教授、挪威计算机与法律研究中心主任)
 
主持人:胡凌(北京大学法学院副教授)
 
 
开讲学者简介:
  Lee Andrew Bygrave教授曾为众多机构担任技术监管专家顾问,其中包括欧盟委员会、北欧部长理事会、互联网名称与数字地址分配机构和挪威政府。Bygrave教授在数据保护法领域发表了大量论文,他是2020年由牛津大学出版社出版的《欧盟<一般数据保护条例>评注》一书的共同编辑和共同作者。他的数据保护学术成果得到了欧盟法院的认可。
  Dr. Lee A. Bygrave is full professor at the Department of Private Law, University of Oslo, where he is Director of the Norwegian Research Center for Computers and Law. He has functioned as expert advisor on technology regulation for numerous organisations, including the European Commission, the Nordic Council of Ministers, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, and the Norwegian government. Professor Bygrave has published extensively within the field of data protection law. He is co-editor and co-author of a comprehensive article-by-article analysis of the EU General Data Protection Regulation published by Oxford University Press in 2020. His data protection scholarship has been cited with approval by the Court of Justice of the European Union.
 
 
讲座摘要:
  欧洲个人数据保护监管框架中最有争议的规则之一是个人有权不受对他们有法律或重大影响的自动化决策的限制,其主要表现在欧盟《一般数据保护条例》(GDPR)第22条。这一规则也体现在其他非欧洲法域,例如《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》(PIPL)第24条。本场讲座中,Bygrave教授将批判性地讨论《一般数据保护条例》(GDPR)下该权利的解释和实施现状,并与《中华人民共和国个人信息保护法》的相应条款进行比较。
  One of the most contentious rules of the European regulatory framework for protection of personal data is a right of individuals not to be subject to fully automated decisions that have a legal or significant impact on them. The chief manifestation of this rule is Article 22 of the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Elements of this rule are also emerging in non-European jurisdictions, with Article 24 of the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) of the People's Republic of China as a prime example. The lecture will critically discuss the current state of play regarding the interpretation and implementation of the right under the GDPR. In doing so, some careful lines of comparison will be drawn with the equivalent provisions of the PIPL.
 
 
讲座海报: